Robotic Process Automation

The 2026 Magic Quadrant for Robotic Process Automation, published June 24, 2026, evaluates ten providers, a field that has shrunk as the category's identity shifted. The robot that mimicked the human at the screen is being replaced by the agent that acts on its own, and the vendors' own marketing now leads with the new name: agentic process automation. The robot became an agent, and the category is renaming itself after the fact.

The robot that became an agent

RPA's founding promise was the software robot: the automation that mimicked the human's clicks and keystrokes, integrating with the legacy systems the APIs could not reach, without changing anything underneath.

The agentic era changed the promise's arithmetic. The agent does not mimic the human's actions; it understands the task, plans the steps, and executes across systems and models. The market's Leaders now market the agentic layer as the product's center, and the robot, the screen-scraping original, becomes the agent's hands rather than the product itself.

The robot became an agent, and the category is renaming itself after the fact, with the quadrant's ten-vendor field as the evidence of the consolidation the rename brought.

The June 2026 Magic Quadrant for Robotic Process Automation, and its ten-vendor field

The edition published June 24, 2026, authored by Arthur Villa, Melanie Alexander, Saikat Ray, Sachin Joshi, and Adam Briggs.

The ten evaluated providers span the market's new shape: the automation specialists, UiPath, Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, Laiye, and EvoluteIQ, and the platform giants that entered the market from adjacent positions, Microsoft, ServiceNow, Pega Systems, Appian, and Samsung SDS with its Brity Automation.

The confirmed Leaders are UiPath, positioned highest on Ability to Execute and a Leader for seven consecutive years, Automation Anywhere, on its seven-year streak, and SS&C Blue Prism, the long-term occupant of the rung. Laiye holds its sixth consecutive inclusion, the only Chinese vendor in the report, and Samsung SDS its seventh.

The seven-year streaks

The streaks on this rung are the robot era's memory, and they deserve the historical reading: seven consecutive years of UiPath and Automation Anywhere leadership spans the market's entire modern arc, the automation fever of the late 2010s, the pandemic's process crisis, the platform consolidation, and now the agentic turn.

The streaks are the market's consistency proof: the vendors that led through the category's hype cycle and its disillusionment are the ones whose platforms absorbed each shift. The buyer inherits the absorption either as accumulated capability or as accumulated architecture, and the streak does not say which.

Seven years of leadership is the robot era's memory, and the agent era's placements will be the first scored under the market's new identity.

The platform giants inside the field

The field's composition is the market's structural statement: Microsoft, ServiceNow, Pega, and Appian now sit in the RPA evaluation alongside the specialists.

The giants entered the field to absorb the capability, and their presence re-prices the specialists' argument. The automation capability is becoming a feature of the platform estates, the workflow, the CRM, the service operations, and the standalone automation vendor's answer must now be the depth the platforms cannot match. The field's ten vendors are the two camps' current negotiation, and the next editions will record who won the argument.

The platform giants entered the field to absorb the capability, and the buyer's choice is now between the specialists' depth and the platforms' adjacency.

The agentic rename

The market's self-renaming, from robotic process automation to agentic process automation, is the edition's forward signal, and the vendors' marketing leads with it: the agent that understands, plans, and executes, with the robot as one of its tools.

The rename's honesty is the buyer's guide: the RPA purchase is increasingly the agent platform purchase, and the vendor's agentic layer, its model strategy, its governance, its human-in-the-loop boundaries, is the forward-looking part of the evaluation. The robot-era criteria, the attended and unattended bots, the recorder, the control room, are the market's table stakes now.

The buyer's question is which vendor survives the rename, and the answer is being scored in the agentic layer, not the robot.

What the shrink means for buyers

The ten-vendor field is the market's consolidation, and the shrink's consequence is the buyer's: the automation estate's consolidation pressure, the specialist vendors' viability, and the platform giants' entry all point toward fewer long-term options.

The honest limit is the same shift: the 2026 placements describe vendors mid-rename, with the agentic claims young and the robot-era architecture underneath them. The record's thinness compounds it: three Leaders confirmed, the remaining placements partially public, and the cautions that would describe each vendor's agentic maturity have not surfaced.

Four questions for the automation buyer

Is the purchase robots or agents? The market's rename is the buyer's first question. Ask whether the workload is the rule-based process the robots own, or the judgment-shaped task the agents are for, and buy for the actual mix.

What is the agentic layer's governance? The agent's autonomy needs boundaries. Ask for the approval flows, the audit trail, and the rollback path of an agent's action, demonstrated on the buyer's own process.

Which platform's ecosystem is the estate already in? The giants' entry means the automation purchase is increasingly an adjacency decision. Match the automation to the estate's existing platforms, or accept the integration cost of the specialist.

Who survives the consolidation? The ten-vendor field is shrinking. Ask about the vendor's viability, its investment in the agentic layer, and its posture toward the giants, because the buyer's automation estate outlives the market's current formation.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

The same shift shows up next door, in Technical Debt Management Tools. Roughly 55 percent of developers now use AI coding agents regularly, and Gartner's brand-new quadrant exists because those agents write debt into the codebase faster than any human review process can catch it.

This market sits next to Digital Process Automation Software, covered separately on this site. Forrester's warning to buyers is specific: look for vendors that integrate AI agents with existing process strengths, not vendors that just demonstrate agent building. Anyone can build an agent. Running a six week process across four systems is the real problem.